The Method of Autonomous Statistical Modeling ASMTurb and its Testing on the Example of Classical Turbulent Flows

2014

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1115/imece2014-36355
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

A physical designation of the method of autonomous statistical modeling turbulent flows (ASMTurb method with consideration of external intermittency) and its testing are presented. The method is tested on the example of constructing of mathematical models for self-similar turbulent shear flows such as: I-the two-stream plane mixing layer; II-the outer region of the boundary layer on the wall; III-the far wake behind a cross-streamlined cylinder; IV-the axisymmetric submerged jet. Test results are presented in the form calculating the main conditional and total statistical averages applied to self-similar region of turbulent flows. It is shown that the ASMTurb models which constructed here are more accurate and more detailed than RANS models. A comparison is made between predictions and known experimental data for energy-containing structure of turbulent flow and excellent agreements are noted.