How regulation of bank capital adequacy and liquidity affects pricing of bonds of the banks

Journal of Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 2020

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.9770/jesi.2020.7.3(18)
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article discusses the evolution of regulation of banks in Kazakhstan before and after financial crisis of 2007-2008.The purpose of the article is to examine how introduction of Basel III standards on capital adequacy and liquidity affected pricing of bonds of Kazakh banks.In general, post crisis reforms in the banking system, mainly Basel III standards, enhanced capital adequacy and liquidity of the banks.Banks now tend to hold more capital and high-quality liquid assets compared to pre-crisis period.Our analysis showed that banks with better liquidity conditions would receive cheaper funding via bonds compared to other banks.We found that bond prices reacted explicitly to the changes in liquidity requirements, rather than capital measures.New capital adequacy measures seem to be less constraining for banks with government support.In contrast, changes in capital measures made substantial impact on bond spreads of banks without government support, these banks actively increased their capital in post crisis period.