Diagnostic and prognostic value of circulating biomarkers in heart failure

Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1633164
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Background: Heart failure (HF) represents a global health burden with distinct phenotypes characterized by varying left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Despite shared endothelial dysfunction, heart failure with reduced (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) exhibit fundamentally different pathophysiological mechanisms, comorbidity profiles, and treatment responses. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis examine inflammatory, cardiac remodelling and congestion, and myocardial injury biomarkers across HF phenotypes, integrating data from 78 studies encompassing 58,076 subjects. Results: Our analysis reveals a significant elevation of IL-6, TNF-alpha, and hs-CRP in HF compared to controls, with distinct biomarker profiles emerging between phenotypes. While inflammatory markers universally increase with disease severity, their utility in phenotypic differentiation remains limited due to substantial overlap. Comorbidity burden significantly influences inflammatory profiles, creating diagnostic challenges that multi-biomarker approaches may address. NT-proBNP, sST2, GDF-15, and cardiac troponins demonstrate complementary value when combined with inflammatory markers, potentially enabling more precise phenotypic classification. Conclusion: Our findings highlight the central role of inflammation in HF pathophysiology while identifying critical knowledge gaps, particularly regarding HFpEF-specific inflammatory signatures. This comprehensive analysis provides a foundation for developing targeted immunomodulatory therapies and personalized diagnostic approaches in heart failure management. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42025639405, PROSPERO CRD42025639405.