Energy efficiency options for buildings: insights from buildings energy audit reports in Kazakhstan

2016

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1049/cp.2016.1280
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

There is a significant potential for energy efficiency improvements in the residential buildings in Kazakhstan. The analysis of energy audits confirmed this statement: heat transfer coefficient of walls is much higher than in European countries with similar climates. In consequence, households consumption of energy in Kazakhstan per square meter of area is nearly three times higher than in Europe. Energy efficiency options with payback period of less than 10 years may contribute in average to the 10% reduction of energy consumption. While all energy efficiency options may contribute in average to 27% reduction of total energy consumption by building. Energy efficiency options with low investment costs and relatively high economic savings are pipe insulation and energy efficient lighting. Whereas recovery of insulation of external walls and basement, energy monitoring as well as replacement of windows and doors in communal entrance hallways are measures with low investment costs and relatively moderate economic savings. There are energy efficiency options with very high payback period - more than 48 years - such as insulation of walls, automated heat supply station, insulation of roofs as well as replacement of windows. These measures are unlikely to be implemented by homeowners themselves, without supporting mechanisms from the Government.