Validity and Motivation of Decisions in Criminal Proceedings

2019

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.14505//jarle.v9.7(37).01
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article examines the concept and meaning of the substantiation and motivation of decisions in criminal proceedings. Achievement of the objectives of the criminal process is directly dependent on the soundness and motivation of criminal proceedings. The requirement that the decision was not only justified, but also motivated, follows from the fact that motivation increases the soundness of the decision, gives it internal and external persuasiveness, simplifies the process of the decision taken by the participants. Motivation is considered a type of reasonableness, where the speculator recognizes the indication of the reason for choosing the option of action. The goal of the article is the absolute theoretical-legal analysis of the validity and motivation of criminal procedural decisions, the introduction of guarantees for the improvement of criminal procedural law and its use.