The Possible Relationship of Cognitive Style Rigidity-Flexibility of Cognitive Control with Properties of Nervous System

Mariya Mun

2013

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.372
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Studying flexibility of thinking in cognitive style “rigidity-flexibility cognitive control” as a mechanism for word-figurative translation information, we come to question the nature of this kind of flexibility. Works of V.M. Rusalov. Relationship between basic properties of nervous system, temperament and abilities are indicated in a “chain of inborn qualities”: “the inborn qualitie.The first level (the properties of the nervous system)” - “the inborn qualities of second-level (temperament)” - “abilities”. Following V.M. Rusalov, our scheme is follows: “mobility of the nervous system” - “temperamental plasticity” - “flexible thinking - cognitive style rigid-flexible cognitive control”. The task is to find out the relationship between flexibility, properties of temperament and properties of the nervous system. The results of correlation and factor analyzes indicate a relationship between the flexibility of thinking with balance and mobility of the nervous system.