Corporate environmental reporting on the internet: an exploratory study

2012

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1504/ijmfa.2012.044838
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

CER is considered a key medium through which to communicate environmental information to its stakeholders. The rapid growth of ‘internet’ technology has enabled the firms to disseminate information to the global audience by removing all geographical barriers. In this study, we explore the status of ER made by 39 corporations during the year 2005–2006, by using ‘content’ analysis methodology. In order to examine the quality of ER by these corporations on their websites, we followed the technology adoption model. The empirical data used in this study is based on the online annual reports and reporting made on their websites. An analysis of information collected indicates that corporations provide more ER on their websites, in sharp contrast, to reporting made within their annual reports. Unfortunately, ER in annual report is general, broad and narrative in nature, without specifically discussing the ‘environment management policy’ followed by the corporation and/or ‘statement of assurance’ from the corporate management regarding compliance with the external standards, if any. We feel this need to be improved soon and there is considerable scope to improve internet- and web-based EID.