Texture recognition by the methods of topological data analysis

2016

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1515/eng-2016-0044
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Abstract High spatial resolution satellite images are different from Gaussian statistics of counts. Therefore, texture recognition methods based on variances become ineffective. The aim of this paper is to study possibilities of completely different, topological approach to problems of structures classification. Persistent Betti numbers are signs of texture recognition. They are not associated with metrics and received directly fromdata in form of so-called persistence diagram (PD). The different structures built on PD are used to get convenient numerical statistics. At the present time, three of such objects are known: topological landscapes, persistent images and rank functions. They have been introduced recently and appeared as an attempt to vectorize PD. Typically, each of the proposed structures was illustrated by the authors with simple examples.However, the practical application of these approaches to large data sets requires to evaluate their efficiency within the frame of the selected task at the same standard database. In our case, such a task is to recognize different textures of the Remote Sensing Data (RSD). We check efficiency of structure, called persistent images in this work. We calculate PD for base containing 800 images of high resolution representing 20 texture classes. We have found out that average efficiency of separate image recognition in the classes is 84%, and in 11 classes, it is not less than 90%. By comparison topological landscapes provide 68% for average efficiency, and only 3 classes of not less than 90%. Reached conclusions are of interest for new methods of texture recognition in RSD.