Pollution of Camel Milk by Heavy Metals in Kazakhstan~!2009-03-31~!2009-11-10~!2009-12-31~!

2010

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.2174/1876397900901010112
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Environmental contamination by heavy metals is a common fact in Central Asia.In the present study two sampling procedures were achieved: (i) Sampling of fodder, camel raw milk and shubat (fermented camel milk) in 8 farms closed to pollution sources from the South of Kazakhstan for copper, iron, manganese, zinc, arsenic and lead analysis, (ii) sampling of camel milk in 4 regions of Kazakhstan (63 samples) analyzed for lead, chrome and zinc contamination.In first sampling, camel milk contained 0.07 ± 0.04, 1.48 ± 0.53, 0.08 ± 0.03, 5.16 ± 2.17, <0.1 and 0.025 ± 0.02 ppm respectively for Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, As and Pb.In shubat (fermented milk) the mean content was 0.163 ± 0.164, 1.57 ± 0.46, 0.088 ± 0.02, 7.217 ± 2.55 and 0.007 ppm respectively.Arsenic was detected in some samples of milk and shubat only.The trace elements concentration increase in shubat compared to milk but lead concentration decreased.No clear correlation was observed with fodder composition.In second sampling, the lead content was on average 250 ± 56 ppb in the camel milk with no significant differences between regions.The maximum value was observed at Atyrau (532 ppb).Zinc content in milk (5.42 ± 0.2 ppm) did not change significantly between regions.In reverse, chrome (59.5 ± 45.4 ppb) was higher in Shymkent region compared to others.These values were discussed according to the proximity of pollution sources.Specially, higher concentrations were experienced in fodder from pastures close to some industrial sites or high traffic road.