Behavioral Biometric Continuous Authentication for Mobile Devices with an Intelligent Personal Agent: A Systematic Review

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/technologies14070451
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Static, one-time authentication mechanisms such as passwords and PINs are increasingly inadequate for protecting mobile devices throughout an active session. Behavioral biometric continuous authentication (BBCA) addresses this gap by passively monitoring user-specific interaction patterns—keystroke dynamics, touch and swipe gestures, gait, and motion—to verify identity on an ongoing basis. This systematic review synthesizes 80 studies selected via a PRISMA-compliant protocol from IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and SpringerLink (2017–2025). We examine behavioral and multimodal biometric modalities, machine learning approaches ranging from classical classifiers to deep sequence and transformer architectures, and their integration with intelligent personal agents, wearable devices, and IoT/edge infrastructures. Security analyses cover spoofing, adversarial and generative attacks, mimicry, and model-level threats including membership inference and reconstruction. Privacy-preserving mechanisms—cancelable biometrics, Bloom filter encodings, zero-knowledge proof protocols, federated learning, and blockchain-based identity management—are evaluated against practical trade-offs in energy consumption and latency on resource-constrained devices. Key research gaps are identified: the absence of standardized adversarial benchmarks, lack of end-to-end pipeline evaluations under simultaneous adversarial and privacy threat models, and limited user-centered studies on consent and acceptance of privacy-preserving mechanisms under frameworks such as GDPR. Recommended future directions combine adaptive multimodal fusion, privacy-preserving cryptography, energy-aware modality selection, and interdisciplinary human-centered evaluation to advance practical, resilient continuous authentication for mobile and assistant-enriched environments.