Comparative Analysis of Metal Preloading Technologies in Batteries and Capacitors

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1002/ece2.70071
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs) are widely used in many fields due to their high energy density and reliability. In addition, other metal‐ion energy storage devices, such as those using Na + , K + , Mg 2+ , and Al 3+ ions, offer significant technological opportunities. The emerging metal‐ion batteries are attracting attention due to their abundant terrestrial reserves and potential low cost of raw materials. Preloading of lithium and other metals in the electrodes has been demonstrated as an effective strategy for enhancing battery performance. In this paper, the advances in the metal preloading technology of LIBs and emerging metal‐ion batteries have been reviewed. The differences between preloading of lithium and other metals have been compared, and their mechanisms in improving the initial coulombic efficiency, cyclic stability, and overall battery performance are discussed. The basic principles and applications of lithium preloading technology are first introduced and then preloading methods in post‐lithium batteries are discussed in detail, including their chemical and physical methods and their effects on battery performance. Additionally, the advantages and challenges of pretreatment technologies in various battery systems have been examined, and their potential limitations have been discussed. Finally, the future direction of lithium and other metal preloading, including the development of new materials, innovation in pretreatment methods, and the potential of these technologies in sustainable energy storage, has been discussed. Sacrificial metal‐salt preloading in the cathode appears to be the most advantageous, leveraging its high energy gain, low process complexity, and superior cycling stability to achieve large‐scale deployment in high‐energy‐density traction batteries.