An Empirical Comparison of Cascade and Direct End-to-End Speech Translation for Low-Resource Language Pair

Zhanibek Kozhirbayev

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/computers15040222
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Speech-to-text translation (S2TT) for low-resource languages remains challenging due to the scarcity of parallel speech translation data and the susceptibility of modular pipelines to error propagation. This paper presents a controlled empirical comparison of cascade and end-to-end approaches for Kazakh–Russian speech translation using the ST-kk-ru dataset (≈332 h, 140 k triplets). The cascade framework is strengthened with recent pre-trained models for automatic speech recognition and neural machine translation, achieving 21.3 BLEU on the test set. Three representative end-to-end architectures are evaluated under identical data conditions. The strongest direct model, combining a Wav2Vec 2.0 encoder with an mBART decoder augmented by a length adaptor and adapter modules, reaches 17.97 BLEU, compared with 15.35 BLEU for FAIRSEQ S2T and 16.3 BLEU for ESPnet-ST. Automatic evaluation is complemented by expert manual assessment and targeted linguistic analysis. Results indicate that, under current low-resource conditions, cascade systems provide higher translation accuracy and better morpho-syntactic fidelity, while end-to-end models remain competitive and offer advantages in architectural simplicity and potentially reduced inference latency (due to single-pass processing), although empirical measurements were not conducted in this study. This study establishes a reproducible benchmark for Kazakh–Russian speech translation and highlights practical trade-offs between modeling paradigms in low-resource, morphologically rich settings.