ESG Maturity and Firm Valuation in an Emerging Market: Evidence of Sectoral Heterogeneity

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/su18052583
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between ESG governance maturity and market valuation in the context of Kazakhstan. The analysis is based on a balanced panel of 13 listed companies covering the period 2019–2024. Firm value was measured using Tobin’s Q coefficient, and ESG maturity was assessed using a specific index that describes the extent to which environmental, social, and governance practices are institutionally embedded within an organization. The results of the fixed-effects model suggest that there is a positive relationship between the aggregate ESG score and a firm’s market value, but it is not statistically significant. When considering the sectoral breakdown, a difference is observed: ESG maturity is positively and significantly associated with market valuation for companies in the financial sector, while no such relationship was found for the non-financial sector. No significant relationship was found between ESG maturity and return on equity (ROE). The results obtained show that the impact of ESG factors in the case of Kazakhstan is not equally visible in all sectors and that, at the present stage, its influence is mainly more pronounced in the financial sector.