A Structured Review of EEG-Based Machine Learning Approaches for Brain Age Prediction

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/a19010091
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The determination of brain age based on electroencephalography (EEG) data has become widely developed with the spread of machine learning in recent years. In this research paper, we analyzed 21 articles published no earlier than 2015, focusing particularly on features, machine learning and deep learning models, and the validation process. The studies reviewed presented model performance on EEG data using machine learning or deep learning techniques. Deep convolutional and transformer-based models trained on well-curated features forecasted chronological age most precisely. In newborns, time–frequency and entropy-based characteristics showed good predictive power for the brain age index (BAI) and functional brain age (FBA). Consistently, spectral and nonlinear descriptors ranked among the most informative characteristics. Methodological rigor, meanwhile, differed: only a small number of studies used bias correction techniques, addressed statistical assumptions, or reported external validation. Preprocessing techniques also showed significant variation. Although EEG-based models have good accuracy, problems of interpretability and generalizability restrict their clinical and developmental use. Advancing this discipline will call for biologically based outcome definitions, uniform evaluation systems, and open source processing pipelines.