Next-generation BCI spellers: a comparative study of ERP responses and fatigue in mixed, virtual, and desktop realities

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1007/s10055-025-01286-y
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Abstract This study provides critical insights into next-generation BCI systems, specifically addressing the challenges of visual and physical fatigue, as well as performance limitations, in VR and MR environments. Conventional Event-Related Potential (ERP)-based spellers typically rely on two-dimensional visual stimuli presented on desktop LED screens. With the emergence of immersive head-mounted displays (HMDs), there is growing interest in integrating ( VR ) and ( MR ) into brain-computer interface (BCI) systems. In this study, we implemented ERP speller systems across Desktop, VR , and MR environments, evaluating (1) P300/N200 mean amplitudes, (2) spelling performance, and (3) physiological and physical fatigue. Using Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) alongside Random Forest (RF), k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN), and XGBoost classifiers, we found that the Desktop environment shows higher P300 and N200 amplitudes, achieving a spelling accuracy of 75% and an Information Transfer Rate (ITR) of 26.1 bits/min, compared to MR (63.4% accuracy, 20.5 bits/min) and VR (60.8% accuracy, 19.8 bits/min). Cross-session experiments, analyzed via two-sided paired t -tests, revealed stable P300 signals in Desktop settings but significant performance declines in VR and MR during prolonged use. Symptom questionnaires indicated that MR induced the highest visual fatigue, while VR caused the most physical fatigue. These findings highlight critical challenges in VR / MR BCI systems, including visual and physical stress and performance degradation, while demonstrating the potential of MR -P300 spellers for applications in neurorehabilitation and assistive communication for motor-impaired individuals. Our results underscore the need for optimized 3D rendering, adaptive user-system mechanisms, and advanced machine learning to enhance next-generation BCI performance in immersive environments.