Resilience of Scientific Collaboration Networks in Young Universities Based on Bibliometric and Network Analysis

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/data10110184
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The resilience of scientific collaboration networks is a key factor in ensuring the long-term academic development of young universities. This study examines the resilience of scientific collaboration networks among young universities based on bibliometric and network analysis. Based on bibliometric data from the open database OpenAlex (as of September 2025, the database contains over 271 million scientific publications and 105 million authors), weighted undirected co-authorship graphs were constructed for four young universities from China, Kazakhstan, and the United Kingdom: Astana IT University, AITU (founded in 2019), Nazarbayev University, NU (2010), University of Suffolk, US (2007), and ShanghaiTech University, STU (2013). Key resilience indicators were calculated, including clustering coefficients, assortativity, modularity, and the dynamics of the largest connected component under different node removal scenarios. The study revealed that NU and STU have a highly resilient structure of scientific collaboration. AITU has been characterized by dynamic development and increasing resilience, particularly after 2023. The US network is fragmented and dependent on a small group of core researchers. However, despite its limited scale, it demonstrates a certain stability in preserving its core. Therefore, recommendations for the development of young universities have been formulated based on the research results. The findings highlight the importance of fostering horizontal scientific ties, deepening international cooperation, and developing long-term institutional strategies for young universities.