From Uncertainty to Consent: Educational Intervention Effects on Knowledge and Willingness to Donate Organs After Death

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/healthcare13192483
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Background: The willingness to donate organs after death remains low in many populations, often due to informational and psychological barriers. This study assessed the impact of an educational lecture on knowledge and attitudes toward postmortem organ donation among university students in Kazakhstan. Methods: A total of 129 students completed a pre-lecture questionnaire on donation attitudes, knowledge, and barriers; 97 also completed the post-lecture assessment. Changes were analyzed using paired t-tests, repeated-measures ANOVA, and logistic regression. Participants were grouped by attitudinal changes to identify predictors of consent. Results: Knowledge about organ donation increased significantly after the lecture (p < 0.001), with larger gains among females and non-medical students. The number of participants who were willing to donate rose from 27 to 56 (p < 0.001). About 37% showed a positive shift, while 3% shifted toward refusal. In the initially ambivalent group (n = 49), female gender (AOR = 35.6), greater knowledge gain (AOR = 3.03), and lower perceived barriers (AOR = 0.05) predicted a change towards consent. Uncertainty about how to express consent was the only significantly differing barrier (p = 0.036). Conclusion: A brief educational lecture effectively increased knowledge and willingness to donate. Targeted information on procedural aspects may reduce indecision and promote informed donor registration.