Comparative Analysis of Wavelet Bases for Solving First-Kind Fredholm Integral Equations

Computation, 2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/computation13080199
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This research presents a comparative analysis of numerical methods for solving first-kind Fredholm integral equations using the Bubnov–Galerkin method with various wavelet and orthogonal polynomial bases. The bases considered are constructed from Legendre, Laguerre, Chebyshev, and Hermite wavelets, as well as Alpert multiwavelets and CAS wavelets. The effectiveness of these bases is evaluated by measuring errors relative to known analytical solutions at different discretization levels. Results show that global orthogonal systems—particularly the Chebyshev and Hermite—achieve the lowest error norms for smooth target functions. CAS wavelets, due to their localized and oscillatory nature, produce higher errors, though their accuracy improves with finer discretization. The analysis has been extended to incorporate perturbations in the form of additive noise, enabling a rigorous assessment of the method’s stability with respect to different wavelet bases. This approach provides insight into the robustness of the numerical scheme under data uncertainty and highlights the sensitivity of each basis to noise-induced errors.