Insulin and Human Serum Albumin Interactions with Core–Shell Fe3O4@SiO2 Nanoparticles Functionalized with Carboranes

2025

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c00731
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide In a biological medium, nanoparticles (NPs) can spontaneously interact with proteins, adsorb onto their surface, and cause conformational and orientation changes of the proteins. As a result, the protein function is influenced in a complex manner. Therefore, a detailed understanding of the nature and specificity of protein–nanoparticle interactions is crucial for the application of functional NPs in medicine. In the presented work, we studied the interactions of GMA-treated SiO 2 NPs with the Fe 3 O 4 core and attached carborane compounds (Fe 3 O 4 /TEOS/TMSPM/GMA/Carborane), designed for boron neutron capture therapy, with human serum albumin (HSA) and insulin. We combined different techniques: spectrofluorometry, circular dichroism spectroscopy, and isothermal titration calorimetry to address this issue. The results show that the adsorption of protein onto the NP surface is enthalpy–entropy-driven, with ensuing structural changes of the protein. As for albumin, the percentage of the α-helix structure in the protein is significantly reduced from 87.59 (free protein) to 40.9% for an NP concentration of 1.8 mg/mL, while the content of the β-sheet and random coil increases from 0.48 to 8.78% and from 11.93 to 50.32%, respectively. The interaction between NPs and small protein–insulin is weaker than that for HSA, confirming less negative Δ H and a 15% decrease in the α-structure content for the highest concentration of NPs. For both proteins, the exposure on Fe 3 O 4 /TEOS/TMSPM/GMA/Carborane affects the polarity of the microenvironment around Trp, which is consequently exposed to a more hydrophobic environment. Calculated values of the radius of gyration and the minimum distance between the proteins and the NPs indicate a stronger interaction and closer binding proximity to the NPs, corroborating experimental observations of the higher binding affinity of HSA to NPs.