John Locke’s Royal African Company and Bahamas Adventurer Slave Stock

2025

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.53765/20512988.46.2.259
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This paper corrects Maurice Cranston’s account of Locke’s involvement in the slave trade by providing new evidence about how he came into possession of shares in the Royal African Company (RAC) and the Bahamas Adventurers (BA). Rather than direct personal investment, all the shares he came to own were transferred from third parties. Beginning in February 1672, Locke recorded in his personal ledger numerous payments made on his behalf to these companies by Thomas Stringer, Ashley Cooper’s steward. Evidence from Locke’s unpublished manuscripts suggests he was probably paid in RAC shares as compensation for his work for the Lords Proprietors of Carolina and the Bahamas. He may also have received shares as reimbursement for disbursements made from his personal funds while serving as Treasurer for the Council of Trade. This paper also examines the context of Locke’s abrupt divestment. It is puzzling that he sold all his shares just when the RAC was poised to become profitable. Three factors may explain his decision to divest: financial pressures caused by the stop of the Exchequer, political conflict with Charles II, or moral misgivings about racialized slavery.