Analysis of the level of social entrepreneurship development: a bibliometric review

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.58732/2958-7212-2024-4-27-38
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Nowadays social entrepreneurship has become a main research area, showing an increasing interest in how entrepreneurial initiatives can address crucial social problems such as poverty, inequality, and environmental issues. Despite its growing importance, the field remains fragmented in terms of theoretical frameworks, interdisciplinary connections, and research collaborations. This study is aimed at analyzing the key areas and intellectual structure of scientific publications in the field of social entrepreneurship using bibliometric methods. The study uses bibliometric analysis and visualization methods of scientific data. The analysis is based on publications indexed in the Scopus and Web of Science databases for 2013-2023. VOSviewer tool has been used to visualize key thematic areas and the structure of scientific cooperation. In addition, regression analysis methods were used to identify factors affecting the citation of scientific papers in this field. The research result demonstrates the existence of separate thematic clusters, centered around key concepts, such as “social entrepreneurship”, “entrepreneurship”, “social impact”, “social responsibility”, and “sustainability”, while themes as “gender”, “bibliometric analysis”, and “network” are identified as promising research directions for further studies. The study also demonstrates that publications in journals with a high impact factor, collaboration with influential authors, and the availability of funding positively correlate with the level of citations. Future research may focus on the impact of digital technologies, public policy, and the institutional environment on the development of social entrepreneurship, as well as exploring strategies for scaling social enterprises without losing their mission.