Evolution of Kazakh and Turkish Languages in the Context of the Image of Korkyt Ata

2024

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.31436/asiatic.v18i2.3422
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The study of modern Kazakh and Turkish languages is crucial in the context of internationalisation and globalisation, as they represent ancient Turkic cultures and national identity elements. The purpose of the study is to analyse the features of the development of the Kazakh and Turkish languages, considering the image of Korkyt Ata in the Kazakh language system. Axiomatic, comparative, and generalisation methods were used. The study reveals that the evolution of modern Turkish and Kazakh languages is a complex process that reflects the interplay between language, culture, and society. Language changes may indicate cultural shifts, including lifestyle, social interactions, and religious beliefs rooted in ancient times. The image of Korkyt Ata, present in the Kazakh language, is not just a linguistic artefact but also a deeply rooted cultural symbol. The linguistic elements used to portray him as an ancestor, wise mentor, and heroic defender form a “code” that can be understood through cultural values. Korkyt Ata’s mention in the language promotes linguistic identity, cultural heritage, and belonging to an ancient culture, especially in the context of language preservation. The practical significance of this study lies in its potential to enhance measures for preserving and strengthening the cultural heritage of Turkic-speaking communities.