Exploring the Effects of Professional Learning Experiences on In-Service Teachers’ Growth: A Systematic Review of Literature

Education Sciences, 2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/educsci15020146
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This systematic review examines the effects of professional learning (PL) experiences on in-service teachers’ self-perceived growth. The study compares formal and informal PL models, drawing on diverse approaches, such as coaching, mentorship, collaborative learning, and reflective practices, to understand how these frameworks impact teachers’ professional efficacy and instructional practices. Using databases like Scopus, Web of Science, and ERIC we analyzed 38 empirical studies, focusing on the teachers’ PL experiences and the resulting self-perceived professional growth across its various domains. The findings indicate that while formal PD sessions (e.g., structured workshops and seminars) support skill development, they often yield mixed results due to their limited adaptability to specific contextual needs. In contrast, informal PL approaches, like mentorship and peer collaboration, foster reflective and practical growth. Combining both PL methods provides the most comprehensive benefits, blending structured learning with the flexibility of informal settings. This review underscores the need for hybrid PL models that address collective and individualized growth pathways, recommending future research into context-sensitive, mixed PL designs to effectively support in-service teachers.