Use of the verb “qyl” in Abay’s works

2020

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.26577/ejph.2020.v179.i3.ph9
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Compared to modern Kazakh, the language of Abay’s works has quite a few differences. These differences are studied in terms of phonetic, morphological and lexical features. One of these features is observed in the use of certain verbs by Abay. For example, in Abaу’s works, the verbs “bagu, tonu, kashyru, sagynu, salu”, etc. were used in their original meanings. The article analyzes the features of the use of the verb “qyl”, used in Abay’s poems and in the edification of “Kara sozder”. In this work, the examples reflect how and how many times Abay used the form “qyl”. Also, words, phrases, phraseological units formed from the verb “kylu” were compared with versions of the modern literary language as “zhasau” and “etu”. Statistics and comparisons of the use of this form with the auxiliary verbs “etu” and “zhasau”, which are actively used in the modern Kazakh language, are given. On the basis of comparative analysis with samples of oral literature, data from Turkic monuments and languages, it was proved that the verb “qyl” is a manifestation of the continuity of traditions used since ancient times. Key words: Abay, Abay’s works, verb, verb “qyl”, comparative analysis.