Digging into the Solubility Factor in Cancer Diagnosis: A Case of Soluble CD44 Protein

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/bios15120796
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The detection of soluble proteins in biological fluids, as a form of liquid biopsy, is a promising tool for cancer diagnosis and prognosis, as it is less invasive than traditional diagnostic methods. CD44 is one of the most recognized markers of cancer stem cells, a small subset of cells responsible for cancer initiation, progression, and metastasis. Given the importance of CD44 as a cancer biomarker, several review articles explore the diagnostic and therapeutic value of cell-surface CD44. In addition to being a membrane-anchored protein, CD44 is also shed from the cell surface and can be found in various biological fluids. However, the role of soluble CD44 in cancer has not been comprehensively discussed in recent reviews. Measuring soluble CD44 in various biological liquids can provide a practical and valuable tool for cancer diagnosis and treatment monitoring. Therefore, this review comprehensively discusses the role of soluble CD44 as a marker in various cancer types, including serum, saliva, urine, and other fluids. In particular, its role as an early cancer biomarker and as a predictive and prognostic biomarker in several cancers is discussed. This work also provides an overview of a wide range of analytical techniques used to detect soluble CD44. The value of cells expressing CD44 versus soluble CD44 as a biomarker is also compared. The review concludes with a perspective on future directions, emphasizing the shift toward non-invasive analytical methods and the need for standardization of detection, including multiple biomarkers during evaluation, to improve the accuracy of cancer diagnosis.