Advancing Intermediate Soil Properties ( ISP ) Interpolation for Enhanced Geotechnical Survey Accuracy. A Review

Engineering Reports, 2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1002/eng2.70328
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Accurate subsurface characterization is essential in geotechnical surveys, yet traditional soil sampling techniques often suffer from sparse data coverage and limited spatial resolution. This review explores recent advancements in Intermediate Soil Properties (ISP) interpolation as a solution to these limitations. By integrating geoprocessing tools with Multidimensional Raster Data (MRD), the proposed approach enables high‐resolution, three‐dimensional modeling of soil property gradients across diverse geotechnical environments. Key findings highlight that ISP interpolation improves the fidelity of subsurface models, supports more accurate risk assessments, and enhances the safety and efficiency of construction planning. Additionally, the method reduces dependency on dense physical sampling, offering a more cost‐effective and scalable alternative. The review further discusses the comparative performance of traditional, hybrid, and machine learning‐based interpolation methods, providing insights into method selection based on data quality and project scale. It concludes with an evaluation of current limitations, including data sparsity and validation bias, and emphasizes the need for future integration with real‐time monitoring and remote sensing technologies.