Students’ perceptions of unified national test scores, state scholarships, and academic performance

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.18844/wjet.v17i1.7695
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The Unified National Testing in Kazakhstan evaluates students’ past academic performance, predicts career prospects, and guides state educational scholarship allocation. This study examines private university students’ perceptions of the relationship between their UNT scores, selected subjects, scholarship opportunities, and academic performance. Using a qualitative approach, data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 20 second-year students from four majors: Finance, Geology, Nursing, and Law. Participants were selected through maximal variation sampling, ensuring diverse views by including those with the highest and lowest UNT scores and GPAs. Thematic analysis, guided by Creswell’s framework, revealed a gap between high school-specific academic skills and the broader competencies required for university success, such as critical thinking, teamwork, and presentation skills. Findings highlight the need to reform the scholarship allocation system by incorporating accessibility measures and better aligning high school preparation with university-level demands. Keywords: Academic performance; examination; scholarship; unified national testing