Examining intermediate soil properties variability through spatial interpolation methods in GIS

2024

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.54355/tbus/4.3.2024.0062
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study compares Kriging and Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) spatial interpolation methods for estimating intermediate soil properties at a construction site in Astana, Kazakhstan. Using data from eight boreholes, seven engineering geological elements (EGE) were identified and analyzed at 6.5 m and 11.5 m depths. Kriging produced deformation modulus values ranging from -0.29 to 18.99 MPa at 6.5 m and -0.51 to 23.94 MPa at 11.5 m, capturing more spatial variability compared to IDW, which provided ranges of 3.3 to 18.99 MPa and 2.6 to 23.99 MPa, respectively. Kriging’s ability to account for spatial correlations resulted in more accurate predictions, particularly in areas with complex subsurface variability. Meanwhile, IDW offered reliable localized results, effective in more uniform geological conditions. The findings demonstrate that both methods are valuable for geotechnical applications, with the choice depending on data density and site variability.