A Comparative Study of Supervised Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques with Feature Selection Methods for Classifying Parkinson’s Disease Based on Speech Impairments

2024

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/sist61555.2024.10629274
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This paper compares and analyzes machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques with different feature selection methods for classifying Parkinson’s disease based on a speech impairments dataset. The dataset was explored by various methods to obtain vocal features, including Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs), Wavelet Transform Features, Vocal Fold Features, and Tunable Q-factor wavelet transform (TQWT). It consists of 754 features and 756 instances. In addition, the study evaluates various classification techniques, including Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Naive Bayes (NB), Deep Neural Network (DNN), 1D Convolution Neural Network (1D CNN). Additionally, we demonstrated the effectiveness of feature selection techniques, namely Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR), and SelectKBest. Among these, the most notable accuracy and precision were achieved by the KNN algorithm combined with PCA, recording values of 93.43% and 93.45%, respectively. Moreover, the Random Forest (RF) algorithm achieved an outstanding recall rate of 100%