Remote Monitoring of Outdoor High Voltage Insulator using Deep Learning-based Image Processing

2021

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/eeeic/icpseurope51590.2021.9584666
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The outdoor high voltage insulators are some of the essential parts for electrical and mechanical assistance of transmission lines. Monitoring the insulators’ health frequently on a regular basis is an indispensable routine for ensuring uninterrupted power transmission. Traditionally, the monitoring is accomplished manually by linemen, which is time-consuming and implies additional logistics costs due to the long distances and various terrains associated with transmission lines. One of the most economic solutions can be condition monitoring by analysis of insulators’ images using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). In this regard, this study focuses on outdoor high-voltage insulators’ health monitoring by deep learning-based classification of hazardous surface conditions. To this end, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) with hyperparameter optimization as well as fine-tuning pretrained deep learning models are employed to classify insulator surface conditions into one of the following four categories: clean, or covered either with snow, ice, or dust. Applying cross-validation external to the CNN hyperparameter optimization and the fine-tuning process of pretrained models yielded remarkable accuracies of 92.07% and 97.80%, respectively.