The Republic of Kazakhstan’s multi-vector foreign policy: Re-evaluation under president Tokayev

2024

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.34044/j.kjss.2024.45.3.21
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study offers an in-depth theoretical examination of Kazakhstan's foreign policy evolution during the power transition from Nursultan Nazarbayev to his chosen successor, Kassym-Jomart Tokayev.The analysis illuminates the under-explored realm of post-Soviet Central Asian states' foreign policies, with a special focus on Kazakhstan and its unique geopolitical, economic, and geographic strengths.The methods encompass a comprehensive review of the distinct foreign policy characteristics under Nazarbayev and Tokayev's presidencies, delineating the continuity and alterations in the nation's multi-vector diplomacy approach.Critical findings underscore that Kazakhstan's foreign policy is stepping into an unprecedented phase, emphasizing geo-economic values more than before.Amidst the backdrop of regional geopolitical instability, Kazakhstan's robust multi-vector foreign policy functions as a stabilizing force.Ultimately, this investigation provides valuable insights that fill a substantial knowledge gap concerning power transition in the context of balance-based or multi-vector foreign policy, primarily within post-Soviet Central Asian states.This contributes significantly to academic discourse and offers an invaluable framework for future policy analysis.