Quality of Service Generalization using Parallel Turing Integration Paradigm to Support Machine Learning

Abdul Razaque, Mohamed Ben Haj Frej, Gulnara Bektemyssova, Muder Almiani, Fathi Amsaad, Aziz Alotaibi, Noor Zaman Jhanjhi, Mohsin Ali, Amanzholova Saule Toksanovna, Majid Alshammari

2023

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/electronics12051129
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The Quality-of-Service (QoS) provision in machine learning is affected by lesser accuracy, noise, random error, and weak generalization (ML). The Parallel Turing Integration Paradigm (PTIP) is introduced as a solution to lower accuracy and weak generalization. A logical table (LT) is part of the PTIP and is used to store datasets. The PTIP has elements that enhance classifier learning, enhance 3-D cube logic for security provision, and balance the engineering process of paradigms. The probability weightage function for adding and removing algorithms during the training phase is included in the PTIP. Additionally, it uses local and global error functions to limit overconfidence and underconfidence in learning processes. By utilizing the local gain (LG) and global gain (GG), the optimization of the model’s constituent parts is validated. By blending the sub-algorithms with a new dataset in a foretelling and realistic setting, the PTIP validation is further ensured. A mathematical modeling technique is used to ascertain the efficacy of the proposed PTIP. The results of the testing show that the proposed PTIP obtains lower relative accuracy of 38.76% with error bounds reflection. The lower relative accuracy with low GG is considered good. The PTIP also obtains 70.5% relative accuracy with high GG, which is considered an acceptable accuracy. Moreover, the PTIP gets better accuracy of 99.91% with a 100% fitness factor. Finally, the proposed PTIP is compared with cutting-edge, well-established models and algorithms based on different state-of-the-art parameters (e.g., relative accuracy, accuracy with fitness factor, fitness process, error reduction, and generalization measurement). The results confirm that the proposed PTIP demonstrates better results as compared to contending models and algorithms.