Comparative effectiveness of interventions for treating interdigital necrobacillosis in cattle: A network meta-analysis

Veterinární Medicína, 2021

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.17221/232/2020-vetmed
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to comparatively evaluate the efficacy of different antimicrobial agents against interdigital necrobacillosis (IN) in cattle to identify the treatment with the greatest benefit. A network meta-analysis was used to synthesise empirical results from randomised controlled trials. Four studies with five interventions for 565 animals were included. The meta-analysis found no significant differences between the risk ratios for the antimicrobials versus placebo. However, ceftiofur sodium administered intramuscularly at a dose of 1.0 μg/kg body weight every 24 h for 3 days showed a better clinical response than 6.6 μg of oxytetracycline, 2.5 μg of tulathromycin, the placebo and 0.1 μg of ceftiofur sodium. The results show the best efficacy for 6.6 μg of oxytetracycline and 1.0 μg of ceftiofur sodium. Nevertheless, the latter is likely to be superior to oxytetracycline in terms of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. Thus, 1.0 μg of ceftiofur sodium appears to provide the best therapeutic activity against IN in cattle. Further well-designed studies are required.