Applying of audioanalytics for determining contingencies

2017

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.23919/iccas.2017.8204327
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

While video analysis has become a standard feature of many security cameras, built audioanalytics remains relatively rare, despite the presence of both the audio channels in the devices and the available computing power to process audio data. However, audioanalytics has certain advantages over video analytics: microphones and maintenance cost is significantly less expensive than cameras; when the system is in real-time audio data stream is substantially less in volume than the flow of data from the video cameras, which imposes more loyal to the bandwidth requirements of data transmission channel. Audioanalytics systems can be especially in demand for urban surveillance, where you can automatically start to broadcast live video on the police control from the place of explosion and fire. Audioanalytics technology can also be used in the study and recording of certain events. In this study, we consider methods to identify audio event recognition, create a surveillance model using audioanalyitics methods and identify audio events by experiments.