Downside risk connectedness between Islamic sectors and green bond markets: implications for hedging and investment strategies

2024

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1080/00036846.2023.2295305
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between the green bond and Islamic sectoral markets in terms of downside risk. A new framework was developed using CAViaR and QVAR techniques to construct hedging and portfolio strategies. Results show higher levels of downside risk connectedness and spillover across different risk environments, with short-run connectedness outperforming long-run. The downside risk connectedness and spillover are time-varying, influenced by major events like the Shale Oil Revolution, US–China trade war, COVID-19 pandemic, and Russo-Ukrainian conflict. Green bond market indices of China, the European Union, the US, and the global market receive net shocks in moderate and higher downside risk environments across various frequencies. US and global green bonds exhibit net transmitter roles in a downside-risk environment. Islamic Sectors BM, OG, FIN, CG, and HC are shock transmitters, while TELE and UTL are shock receivers across different downside risk environments and frequencies. Net roles are CS, INDUS, and TECH, subject to the downside risk environment and frequencies.