Specifics of Development of the Integral Method of Knowledge Estimation

2015

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.5539/res.v7n7p284
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The problem of testing-based objective estimation of knowledge acquires new forms and content in the context of new paradigms. Analysis of current test methods suggests that sometimes questions with answers assuming multiple choice or multiple choice and formulation do not allow objective estimation of students’ knowledge that results in reduction of the simulating effect of pedagogical grades on the cognitive activity of students and educational process quality in general. This article suggests an integral method of knowledge estimation based on a new approach to question and answer formulation enabling free formulation of a test answer. The theoretically justified and experimentally verified data can be used in order to improve control and estimation of knowledge by the social and humanitarian subjects.