The role of experts in the Covid-19 pandemic and the limits of their epistemic authority in democracy

2022

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.26686/nzsr.v76i3.7816
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Copyright © 2020 Lavazza and Farina. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative CommonsAttribution License (CC BY). It was originally published in Frontiers in Public Health, 14 July 2020 | Volume 8 | Article 356 (https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00356) and is published here with permission.