Photometric supernovae redshift systematics requirements

2019

Full text Open access: Green Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1103/physrevd.100.043542
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Imaging surveys will find many tens to hundreds of thousands of Type Ia supernovae in the next decade and measure their light curves. In addition to a need for characterizing their types and subtypes, a redshift is required to place them on a Hubble diagram to map the cosmological expansion. We investigate the requirements on redshift systematics control in order not to bias cosmological results, in particular dark energy parameter estimation. We find that additive and multiplicative systematics must be constrained at the $\text{few}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}3}$ level, effectively requiring spectroscopic follow-up for robust use of photometric supernovae. Catastrophic outliers need control at the subpercent level. We also investigate sculpting the spectroscopic sample.