Application of differential evolution algorithm and comparing its performance with literature to predict rock brittleness for excavatability

2020

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1080/17480930.2019.1709012
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to estimate brittleness of intact rock by applying differential evolution (DE) algorithm and then to compare the results obtained from the optimum model with literature. For this aim, several models including linear and nonlinear were developed for predicting the brittleness via DE algorithm using the dataset obtained from 48 tunnel cases around the world. Each model were developed using 80% of the dataset as training and 20% of the dataset as testing in random. After that, developed models are compared according to the coefficient of correlations (r2), computer process unit (CPU), mean-squared error (MSE) and number of function evaluation (NFE) values to choose the best accurate one among them. It is found that the values r2, MSE, NFE and CPU ranged between 0.9385–0.9501, 8.2616–9.938, 7217–11,176 and 4.91–36.22, respectively, with the quadratic model (QM) indicating the best performance. It is concluded that the DE algorithm is itself very powerful tool for estimating the brittleness; however, the QM is superior especially for simulations in which computational time and optimisation is a critical.