Bridging gaps with technology: A bibliometric review of inclusive education through educational technology

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.30935/cedtech/17980
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study reviews research on inclusive education through educational technology by exploring 184 Scopus-listed English-language publications published over the years 2010-2025 using systematic methods. We assess publication trends, citation relationships, where the work is published, who the authors are, how institutions are involved and funding sources to see the growth of this high-priority area of study. From 2010, we note a slow start, but from 2011 publications increased steadily until 2018. From 2019 to 2023, the pace of growth has been much faster, leading to an increase in annual publications over the last decade. Spanish, American and United Kingdom forces account for most of the participation, whereas developing countries are not strongly represented. The citation analysis indicates that the studies related to assistive technology, universal design for learning and teacher training represent the most significant literature in the area, and the average citations have increased more than three times since 2015. Network diagrams highlight the many joint research efforts among European nations, but opportunities for North-South cooperation are still limited. In fact, most of studies were supported, mainly by national education departments and the European Union framework. An analysis of keywords demonstrates how education has shifted focus, from using basic technology in the early 2010s to using artificial intelligence for personalized learning in the 2020s. The report ends by pointing out four major areas for future study as using virtual and augmented reality for students with special needs, addressing ethical considerations with AI in all schools, preparing all teachers to use technology in class and finding affordable technology for low-resource schools. These results provide proof for policymakers and highlight areas that should be looked into further.