Current and emerging medical treatment options for corneal persistent epithelial defects

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1080/17469899.2026.2635764
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Introduction Corneal persistent epithelial defects (PEDs) represent a significant clinical challenge due to their multifactorial etiology and their potential to progress to severe complications. Early recognition and effective medical management of PEDs are essential to prevent worsening up to corneal blindness.Areas covered A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed, focusing on established treatments as well as novel therapies targeting neurotrophic dysfunction, inflammation, and extracellular-matrix dysregulation. This review synthesizes current and emerging medical therapies for PEDs, emphasizing mechanisms of action and available clinical evidence, finally offering a coherent, evidence-based strategy.Expert opinion Effective management of PEDs requires a stepwise, mechanism-driven approach that starts with addressing underlying ocular and systemic contributors. While traditional supportive treatments remain foundational, biologically active agents are increasingly crucial for refractory cases. Emerging pathway-specific therapies such as lufepirsen, RGN-259, neurotrophic peptides, growth factors, matrix regenerating peptides, and regenerative secretome-based formulations offer promising targeted strategies, though high-quality evidence remains limited. Future progress will depend on identification of biomarkers guiding therapy selection and robust clinical trials to validate emerging agents and support more personalized treatment algorithms.