A Multi-Level Hybrid Architecture for Structured Sentiment Analysis

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/electronics15020249
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This paper presents a hybrid architecture for automatic sentiment analysis of Kazakh-language political discourse. The Kazakh language is characterized by an agglutinative structure, a complex word-formation system, and the limited availability of digital resources, which significantly complicates the application of standard neural network approaches. To account for these characteristics, a multi-level system was developed that combines morphological and syntactic analysis rules, ontological relationships between political concepts, and multilingual representations of the XLM-R model, used in zero-shot mode. A corpus of 12,000 sentences was annotated for sentiment polarity and used for training and evaluation, while Universal Dependencies annotation was applied for morpho-syntactic analysis. Rule-based components compensate for errors related to affixation variability, modality, and directive constructions. An ontology comprising over 300 domain concepts ensures the correct interpretation of set expressions, terms, and political actors. Experimental results show that the proposed hybrid architecture outperforms both neural network baseline models and purely rule-based solutions, achieving Macro-F1 = 0.81. Ablation revealed that the contribution of modules is unevenly distributed: the ontology provides +0.04 to Macro-F1, the UD syntax +0.08, and the rule-based module +0.11. The developed system forms an interpretable and robust assessment of tonality, emotions, and discursive strategies in political discourse, and also creates a basis for further expansion of the corpus, additional training of models, and the application of hybrid methods to other tasks of analyzing low-resource languages.