Development of an Ecological-Economic Assessment System for the Sustainable Development of Regions in Kazakhstan

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.2478/eoik-2025-0099
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Abstract This article develops an ecological–economic assessment framework to analyze sustainability trade-offs in regional development in Kazakhstan, focusing on Karaganda and Kyzylorda during 2010–2023. Karaganda, the country’s industrial hub, contributes substantially to GDP but suffers from high CO 2 emissions and industrial pollution that negatively affect human development. Kyzylorda, with an agriculture-and energy-based economy, has lower carbon emissions but faces severe water scarcity, soil salinization, and land degradation that threaten food security and demographic stability. The study applies Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to integrate economic, environmental, and social indicators, using official datasets from the Kazakhstan Bureau of National Statistics, regional environmental reports, and internationally recognized sources. Results demonstrate that in Karaganda, GDP growth and industrial output are strongly correlated with CO 2 emissions, which significantly reduce the Human Development Index (HDI). In Kyzylorda, irrigation inefficiencies and resource extraction accelerate land degradation, negatively affecting population growth and fueling rural out-migration from ecologically stressed areas. The findings underscore that sustainability challenges require region-specific but complementary policy responses. For Karaganda, priorities include a gradual shift to clean energy, stricter emission controls, and diversification into circular and digital economies. For Kyzylorda, urgent measures are water conservation, irrigation reform, and sustainable agricultural practices to restore ecological balance and protect rural livelihoods. By aligning its framework with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 8, 11, and 13, this study contributes to international debates on sustainable pathways for resource-dependent economies and provides actionable insights for policymakers seeking to balance economic growth, environmental protection, and social equity.