Assessing the implementation of project management in public administration: A PEST analysis approach

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.22495/jgrv14i4art20
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This paper examines the level of project management (PM) implementation in the public administration system of the Republic of Kazakhstan, identifying the key factors that influence its successful adoption. The study aims to explore how political, economic, social, and technological (PEST) factors shape the institutionalization of PM in government. A qualitative research methodology is used, combining PEST analysis with a review of legal frameworks and expert evaluations. The findings reveal that social and technological factors, such as insufficient human capital and underdeveloped digital infrastructure, exert the most significant influence on implementation outcomes. Political constraints, including bureaucratic rigidity, and economic limitations, such as inadequate funding, also present major barriers. The study concludes that comprehensive institutional reform — particularly in digitalization, capacity building, and regulatory improvement — is essential for the effective adoption of PM practices. This research contributes to the growing body of literature on public sector PM (Crawford & Helm, 2009; Heeks, 2006) and highlights the relevance of context-sensitive implementation strategies in developing countries. The study’s relevance lies in its potential to guide Kazakhstan’s public administration toward more efficient and accountable governance through the structured use of project-based methods.