Evaluating Gaia Astrometric Quality and Distances for Galactic Hot Supergiants

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/universe11110359
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Distances to Galactic BA supergiants are essential for determining their luminosities, radii, and positions on the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram, yet Gaia parallaxes for these bright, extended sources are often affected by systematics. We compiled a homogeneous sample of 132 B0–A5 supergiants and re-evaluated their distances using a consistent, quality-controlled approach. Parallaxes from Gaia DR3 and EDR3 were corrected for a magnitude–colour zero-point bias and adjusted for excess noise through RUWE-dependent uncertainty inflation. A Bayesian inference with an exponentially decreasing space–density prior was then applied, adopting the catalogue with the smallest penalised total uncertainty. Distances were accepted only when the corrected parallax signal-to-noise ratio exceeded 2.5, the relative uncertainty was below 40%, and key Gaia quality indicators were nominal. The resulting catalogue delivers robust, quality-vetted distances with realistic uncertainties for each star, providing a reliable foundation for deriving fundamental parameters and for future studies of the flux-weighted gravity–luminosity relation and the evolution of Galactic BA supergiants.