Effects of Three Different Biochars on Microbial Community and Their Corresponding Bioelectricity Generation Mechanism in PMFCs Under Unsaturated Conditions

2025

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1002/tqem.70145
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigates the effects of three biochars—corn straw biochar (CSB), reed straw biochar (RSB), and applewood biochar (AWB)—on microbial communities and bioelectricity generation in plant microbial fuel cells (PMFCs) under unsaturated soil conditions. Biochars were incorporated at 5% mass ratio into silty lean clay soil planted with Hydrocotyle vulgaris , with bioelectricity, soil moisture, and microbial diversity monitored during drought simulation. Key results revealed that RSB‐amended PMFCs achieved the highest power density (1608 mW/m 2 ), surpassing AWB (730 mW/m 2 ), CSB (63 mW/m 2 ), and the control (52 mW/m 2 ). RSB enhanced bioelectric potential and current by 4.5× and 23 × , respectively, compared to the control, attributed to its high porosity (29.198 m 2 /g surface area) and microbial diversity (Chao1 = 888.09; Shannon = 8.09). AWB, despite lower microbial richness (Chao1 = 333.40), sustained bioelectricity via hydrophilic functional groups (─OH, ─NH₂), favoring Aeromonas dominance (45.87% abundance). Microbial analysis identified Proteobacteria (60.41%–74.66%) and Firmicutes (1.29%–12.89%) as key electroactive phyla, with genera Pseudomonas (up to 24.08%) and Aeromonas driving electron transfer. CSB exhibited intermediate performance, limited by lamellar pore structure and reduced microbial diversity (Shannon = 6.83). The findings demonstrate that biochar feedstock critically influences PMFC performance: RSB optimizes microbial diversity and electroactivity, while AWB leverages hydrophilicity for drought resilience. This study advances sustainable bioenergy strategies by linking biochar properties to microbial‐electrogenic synergies, offering pathways to enhance PMFC efficiency in water‐stressed environments.