Fine-Tuning Methods and Dataset Structures for Multilingual Neural Machine Translation: A Kazakh–English–Russian Case Study in the IT Domain

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/electronics14153126
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study explores fine-tuning methods and dataset structures for multilingual neural machine translation using the No Language Left Behind model, with a case study on Kazakh, English, and Russian. We compare single-stage and two-stage fine-tuning approaches, as well as triplet versus non-triplet dataset configurations, to improve translation quality. A high-quality, 50,000-triplet dataset in information technology domain, manually translated and expert-validated, serves as the in-domain benchmark, complemented by out-of-domain corpora like KazParC. Evaluations using BLEU, chrF, METEOR, and TER metrics reveal that single-stage fine-tuning excels for low-resource pairs (e.g., 0.48 BLEU, 0.77 chrF for Kazakh → Russian), while two-stage fine-tuning benefits high-resource pairs (Russian → English). Triplet datasets improve cross-linguistic consistency compared with non-triplet structures. Our reproducible framework offers practical guidance for adapting neural machine translation to technical domains and low-resource languages.