Single-Stage Endovascular Management of Concurrent Intracranial Aneurysms and Arterial Stenoses: Clinical Outcomes, Procedural Strategies, and Predictive Factors

Marat Sarshayev, Shayakhmet Makhanbetkhan, Aiman Maidan, Roger Barranco, Dimash Davletov, Abzal Zhumabekov, Mynzhylky Berdikhojayev

Brain Sciences, 2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/brainsci15070744
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Background: The coexistence of extracranial arterial stenoses and intracranial aneurysms presents a unique clinical dilemma. While staged interventions are traditionally preferred to reduce procedural risks, recent advances have enabled single-stage endovascular treatment. This study evaluates the clinical outcomes, procedural strategies, and predictive factors associated with such combined interventions. Methods: This retrospective study included 47 patients treated with single-stage endovascular procedures for concurrent extracranial stenosis and intracranial aneurysm between 2016 and 2024. Clinical, angiographic, and procedural data were collected. Outcomes were assessed using the mmodified Rankin Scale (mRS), and statistical analyses were performed to identify associations between clinical variables and functional outcomes. Results: Of the 47 patients, 85.1% achieved favorable outcomes (mRS 0–2) at ≥6-month follow-up. The most commonly treated arteries were the internal carotid artery (70.2%) and the middle cerebral artery (34%). Stent-assisted coiling or flow diversion was performed in 93.6% of aneurysm cases, while 91.5% underwent carotid or vertebral stenting. Lesion laterality (left-sided aneurysms, p = 0.019) and stenosis length (p = 0.0469) were significantly associated with outcomes. Smoking was linked to multiple stenoses (p = 0.0191). Two patients experienced major complications: one aneurysmal rebleed after stenting, and one intraoperative rupture. Conclusions: Single-stage endovascular treatment for patients with concurrent extracranial stenosis and intracranial aneurysm is technically feasible and clinically effective in selected cases. Lesion configuration, anatomical considerations, and individualized planning are critical in optimizing outcomes.