The impact of on-the-job training subsidies on firm-level outcomes: evidence from Flemish SMEs

2025

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1007/s11187-025-01117-z
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

We assess how subsidies for on-the-job training affect firm performance. Using a difference-in-differences research design, we find that these subsidies positively influence firm size, wages, and productivity. Over 4 years, employment increases by 3.55%, value added by 5.68%, and labor costs by 3.60%. Average wages and labor productivity grow by 1.95% and 2.12%, respectively. In the first year of treatment, a notable discrepancy exists between the wage (1.21%) and productivity (2.18%) effects, indicating incomplete rent-sharing. These positive effects are primarily seen in smaller firms, which significantly increase training expenditures and hours in the year they receive subsidies, resulting in more trained and skilled workers. Larger firms do not show similar effects, highlighting the possibility that smaller firms face greater financial constraints. Additionally, we find that subsidies focused on training in human resource management, logistics, and business skills drive these positive outcomes for firm size at the firm level.