Development of ann-based data-driven ground motion model for Azerbaijan using temporal earthquake records of 2022–2024

2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3389/feart.2025.1571640
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study evaluates the Soviet-era ground motion prediction equation (named as A&K-1979) and introduces an Artificial Neural Network (ANN)-based GMM specifically designed for Azerbaijan to improve prediction accuracy. Ground motion models (GMMs) are essential for predicting earthquake-induced ground motions, aiding seismic hazard assessments and engineering designs. While traditional linear empirical models have been widely used, they often struggle to capture complex nonlinear ground motion behaviors. The performance of A&K-1979 was assessed using a strong-motion dataset comprising 500 records collected between 2022 and 2024. Two variants of A&K-1979 were tested: A&K-1979-1 for PGA ≥160 cm/s2 and A&K-1979-2 for PGA <160 cm/s2. An ANN-based GMM was developed using earthquake magnitude and hypocentral distance as inputs, followed by three hidden layers (32-32-16 neurons) with the Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU) activation function. The model was validated with a separate dataset of 268 records, evaluated using metrics such as bias, standard deviation of residuals (σ), mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and R2. The A&K-1979 model exhibited notable prediction biases: A&K-1979-1 overestimated PGA values, while A&K-1979-2 underestimated them. The ANN-based GMM achieved improved performance metrics, with a bias of -0.0076, σ of 0.5971, MAE of 0.4416, RMSE of 0.5972, and an R2 of 0.4601. The improved accuracy of the ANN-based GMM highlights its potential as a valuable tool for seismic hazard assessments in Azerbaijan. By providing enhanced prediction capabilities, the ANN model demonstrates greater reliability and practical value than A&K-1979, reinforcing the need for updated predictive models in the region and supporting its use in preliminary hazard analysis.